"2016: Obama's America" becomes a surprise hit in U.S. cinemas

Anti-Obama documentary is for movie hit

2016: Obama's America (2012)

Creates it in the top ten of the charts - Conservative criticism of the U.S. president as content

Los Angeles - A few months before the U.S. presidential election has made it an anti-Obama documentary up into the top ten of the U.S. box office. The movie "2016: Osama’s America" ​​was started last weekend in theaters nationwide. He has since played already a $ 6.2 million and reached number 8 in the rankings, which was of Sylvester Stallone's "The Expendables 2" led with $ 18.5 million.

"2016: Osama’s America" ​​is a harsh conservative criticism of the policies of U.S. President Barack Obama, who is currently fighting for his re-election. In the film, an image is created, such as the U.S. will look like in four years if Obama remains in power.

Usually, after the summer blockbusters in the U.S. business is the end of August rather bad. Since that time, but in Hollywood brings out less banding, also opens the doors for surprise successes such as "Osama’s America" ​​that was shown after the initial launch in selected cinemas in mid-July to this past weekend in more than 1,000 cinemas.

Overall, the film based on the book "The Roots of Osama’s Rage" is based (The Roots of Osama’s hatred) by Dinesh D'Souza, played in the U.S. $ 9.1 million. A solid performance for a political documentary, but still far behind the leader, Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11", which came in the U.S. alone at $ 119.1 million. (APA, 27/08/2012)

2016: Obama's America (2012)

Austria's Faymann

Austria is a leader when it comes to information from the civil to hide why would get little information together for it.

One need only watch the ads affair - in any other Western European country would be the chancellor resigned voluntarily. In the banana republic Austria just reading: "not indictable" - and good.

Ethics education in schools would be really good idea but our politicians should emulate this course quickly when Humboldt.

One of you can go to the comments here and find elsewhere:

Obama and his trailer have destroyed the relationship between the races more than anyone since George Wallace.

2016: Obama's America (2012)

Not only can you criticize Obama in any way, you may also use some ordinary words like "cool", "skinny" or "angry" is no longer associated with Obama.

Even Bill Clinton was called a racist and thus silenced. Since then goes through a crack, the Democratic Party, which will hurt the Democrats still?

Obama and his trailer have made Martin Luther King's famous words on his head. It no longer counts for a man's character, but only his skin.

2016: Obama's America (2012)

In the U.S., it exists as an official category. Works primarily on self-assignment, as a cultural, identification assignment, not biological taxonomy meant quality, but in this sense they are there. One must at all

Not (scientific or otherwise) consider a single language as the sole, absolute, and the everyday language is probably right, especially if they remain there and thought of other things. For example, one can make sense in some contexts, the "whale" talk (as a mythological figure or the constellation, at least), even if the scientific assignment contrary, because the word was there before, the whale (which is probably a word for fish derived) was not seen erroneously as fish, but "fish", "animal", etc. according to other criteria were defined (as the spider was never an insect, because actually purely scientific term, insects, spiders, other invertebrates and snakes dragon + Rather, the group of "worms" were).